Reviewer Guidelines

​

• Peer Review Guidelines for the American Journal of Researching Science

• Manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Researching Science undergo a double-blind peer review process, ensuring the anonymity of both authors and reviewers to minimize potential bias. Peer review is essential to maintaining the integrity and quality of published articles. Reviewers are asked to provide a recommendation to the Editor regarding whether a manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected.

​

Reviewer Responsibilities

​

1. Relevance & Scope
   Reviewers must first determine whether the submitted manuscript falls within the scope of the journal and adheres to the specific submission guidelines before proceeding with the review.

​

1. Citation & Literature Review
   Reviewers should ensure that relevant prior research is appropriately cited and discussed in the manuscript.

2. Statistical and Language Review

   • Verify that appropriate statistical analyses have been conducted where applicable.

   • Identify any grammatical, spelling, or typographical errors that require correction.

3. Validity of Conclusions
   Reviewers should assess whether the conclusions drawn are supported by the results presented.

4. Technical Accuracy
   Note any errors or inconsistencies related to scientific notations, equations, superscripts/subscripts, figures, diagrams, references, and bibliography formatting.

5. Final Recommendation
   Reviewers must provide a final recommendation, choosing from the following options:

   • Accept

   • Minor Revision

   • Major Revision

   • Reject

   This recommendation should be accompanied by clear, constructive comments for the authors and confidential notes to the Editor if necessary.

6. Timely Submission
   If a manuscript is assigned to a reviewer, it is expected that the review report be submitted by the given deadline. Timely feedback is essential to maintain an efficient publication process.

​